Preemptive Nuclear Strike; An Analysis on the New North Korea Nuclear Law

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: On September 9, 2022, North Korea parliament approved a new law on the use of nuclear arms that its provisions and strategic consequences are of very notable. Zeynab Farhadi, Researcher of Asian Affairs

Based on the new nuclear law, the nuclear state of North Korea has been defined as irreversible. In the meantime, the right to use preemptive nuclear strikes for self – protection has been recognized. The new nuclear law of September 9, 2022 will replace the previous 2013 law that outlined the nuclear state of North Korea for the first time.

The measure is taken by Pyongyang while from international observers’ point of view North Korea is preparing itself to resume new nuclear tests which are supposed to be done for the first time since 2017 followed by historic meetings between North Korea and the United States of America.

North Korean leader Kim’s statement on the law is very interesting. He said in a speech that “the most important aspect in the approval of the new law is the outline of an irreversible path which makes impossible the deal over our nuclear arms”. He added:” even if the country is subjected to a hundred years of sanction, it never quits its nuclear capability”.

The law is important from different aspects. From one hand, it provides a strong legal guarantee to strengthen North Korea’s position as a country that has nuclear arms and makes the nuclear policy of North Korea transparent and precise. On the other hand, the law makes the scope of authorities and action of North Korea much wider than the previous law.

While it was spelled out in 2013 law that North Korea can use nuclear arms to avert offenses or assaults made by a nuclear hostile country and make retaliatory attacks, the new law goes far beyond that and let nuclear preemptive strikes.

One can mention the following factors on the reason why the previous law was amended and the recent one was approved:

  • Compulsion of the world community to admit the situation of North Korea as a “nuclear country”;
  • Re-enforcement of the position of North Korean leader and protecting him in circumstances when there is a contingency of Pyongyang regime change by the U.S. and South Korea;
  • South Korea’s Kill Chain Strategy; based on the strategy, South Korea can assault nuclear infrastructures and commanding system of the country in case it suspects the occurrence of an imminent assault by North Korea. According to Kim, the strategy paves the ground for long term tensions between the two Koreas and makes the security status of Pyongyang more fragile and vulnerable.
  • Election of Yoon Suk – yeol as the President of South Korea in March 2022, his tough policies as well as positions versus North Korea. During his presidential campaign, he promised South Koreans to adopt tougher positions on North Korea in comparison with previous South Korea’s presidents who used to have compromising approach, and if it requires, he will make preemptive strike against North Korea.

The approval of the new North Korean nuclear law will be coupled with important effects and consequences at regional and international levels. The first strategic consequence of the approval will be fragility of security environment of North East Asia and encouraging regional players to strengthen their military capability.

It is obvious that the U.S. regional allies, i.e. Japan and South Korea will be among these players. Mounting economic pressures and imposition of further economic sanctions on North Korea are among other predictable consequences of the decision. The U.S. increased presence in East Asia, holding military war games and maneuvers with the collaboration of regional allies will be the third conceivable consequence of the decision.

To finally conclude, it can be said that the decision made by North Korea escalates regional tensions more than ever and deepens concerns about the risks emanated from miscalculation or unwanted nuclear clash in Asia and Pacific region.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading