Passive Demand of 9 Arab States from Zionist Regime

2020/07/19 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The Arab states, which have good relations with the West and the United States in principle, are somehow seeking to reduce the current Israeli-Palestinian tensions, because the current trend is not in their favour and will strengthen the approach of the Resistance groups; Therefore, they have called on Israel to strengthen the position of the countries and groups that are in favour of compromise in the Islamic world by entering into the negotiation process with the Palestinian groups. Hossein Ajorlou - Middle East Affairs Expert

The foreign ministers of nine Arab countries, namely Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Oman, Kuwait and Palestine, after a joint video conference at the invitation of Jordan and attended by the Secretary General of the Arab League called on Israel to initiate “direct, serious and effective talks with the Palestinians to accomplish peace based on two-state solution” and demonstrate that it is moving towards peace.

On the issue of Palestine, almost all Arab states believe in a two-state solution; Especially after King Abdullah’s proposal in 2005, we saw that most Arabs agreed to the plan to form two governments on the 1967 borders. This is a plan that has been supported in some way by the United Nations and Europe. The countries that have called for this kind of negotiation seem to have apparently concluded that the cessation of negotiations and the disregard of the Palestinian side will lead to the outbreak of a war in the region, which will affect both the Palestinians as well as the Zionists. But it seems that these countries are making such a request; because this path has been tried once and from the late 1980s and early 1990s, the Palestinians entered the negotiation process and continued this policy. So the problem was not the Palestinians’ failure to conclude the talks, and if they accepted to make a compromise was because they might be able to assert some of their rights in some way.

Another issue that some Arab countries may not pay attention to is that the Zionist regime is an expansionist regime, and whenever it enters the negotiations, it is somehow in a weak position and has taken tactical steps in the negotiations. But the general process and strategy of this regime has always been expansionism, so that whenever it has been able to advance its goals, it has never entered the process of compromise or international trends. As we can see the result of the first intifada (1987-1988) in Oslo, because at that time and situation, the Israelis were under a lot of pressure and therefore entered the negotiation process. During the Second Intifada, we saw again that the Zionists entered the negotiations more seriously. But as the second intifada subsided, the Israelis somehow abandoned the compromise and implement their own plans.

In recent years, it seems that the Palestinians, who to some extent believed in the reconciliation process, have taken all sorts of steps in this direction; Including securing the districts and even dealing with the Resistance groups; But the result was that the Zionists now carried out that process in East Jerusalem; and in West Jerusalem, with the “Deal of the Century,” gave the Zionist regime in various areas around the West Bank and the Jordan River.

As a result, the reality is that the Zionist regime is basically not pursuing any plan for peace and reconciliation, and the gestures it is making are specific to the situation in which it is either in a tight spot or wants to make this issue visible to its international allies; But whenever Tel Aviv reduces its problems and challenges, it moves in the same direction and expansionism.

In such a situation, the only way left for the Palestinians is to welcome the Resistance, and the Arab countries should be aware of this because the Resistance has led the Zionist regime to retreat from some areas. A clear example of this was in southern Lebanon. In 1982, the Zionist regime occupied southern Lebanon, but with the formation of the Resistance groups and later, more organizationally, the Lebanese Hezbollah and the Amal Movement, we see that in 2000, Tel Aviv withdrew from southern Lebanon due to the resistance of these groups, and there was no compromise.

As for Gaza Strip we see in 2005 that if the Zionists decided to evacuate that area, it was because of the resistance of Palestinian groups. Many experts even believe that the evacuation of Sinai, although seemingly compromised, frightened the Israeli regime with the relative victory of Arabs in 1973 and their advances, and that if the Arab states had not made progress at that time, the Israelis would have thought that they might be able to implement their tactics in the long run and enter the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

Finally, some Arab states, which in principle have good relations with the West and the United States, somehow seek to reduce the current tensions, because the current trend is not in their favor and will strengthen the approach of the Resistance groups. Therefore, they have called on Israel to strengthen the position of the countries and groups that are in favor of compromise in the Islamic world by entering the negotiation process. They know that if this process fails and the conflict between the Zionist regime and the Palestinians intensifies, it will probably strengthen the position of the resistance groups and their supporters.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading