Scenarios Ahead of Kashmir Crisis

2019/09/30 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: There is a scenario about Kashmir whereby in the absence of any solution, the critical situation of Muslims in Kashmir will continue until other options are found in India and Pakistan in the future. Nozar Shafiei - Subcontinent Affairs Expert

The current events in Kashmir between India and Pakistan are the outcome of what happened about a month ago when the Indian government revoked Kashmir’s autonomy. The root of this crisis, of course, goes back to many years ago, at least to 1974 when the Indian Subcontinent was divided. At that point, however, it was not made clear whether Kashmir should eventually join India or Pakistan. So, tensions and conflicts have been going on between India and Pakistan ever since.

From time to time, conflicts are exacerbated under various pretexts. In fact, Pakistan considers the break-up of the Indian Subcontinent and its national unity incomplete without annexing Kashmir. Pakistan claims that the Indian Subcontinent is divided on the basis of religion, geographical location and the will of the inhabitants of each region, and if these are our basis, Kashmir should join Pakistan.

That is why Pakistan invaded Kashmir in 1947. In contrast, India believes that in the year after Pakistan attacked Kashmir, the Indian-dominated Hindu ruler of India, Harry Singh, demanded military assistance from New Delhi and agreed that Kashmir come under the Indian control irrespective of India’s foreign and military policy. So from Delhi’s point of view, Kashmir is an integral part of India.

Also at that time, Lord Mountbatten, the governor-general of India, believed that the best way to bring about peace was for Kashmir to be controlled by India until a public vote on Kashmir’s fate takes place. Accordingly, the Indian army occupied two-thirds of Kashmir and Pakistan took control of the northern part of the state. In fact, the end of the first war between the two countries in 1949 was accompanied by the division of Kashmir and the creation of a “line of control” between the two countries. So these issues have existed in the past and caused tensions between India and Pakistan, with both countries having their own nuclear weapons.

Since the issue of Kashmir is a territorial one it is very difficult to resolve, especially as India believes that Kashmir is a domestic issue and ultimately a matter of Indian-Pakistani relations that does not allow any country or organization to enter into the dispute. Unlike India, Islamabad seeks to internationalize this issue.

Now that India has abolished Kashmir’s autonomy, rhetoric between the two countries’ authorities has intensified. In the latest reaction, the Indian Foreign Minister has declared that Pakistan’s Kashmir is part of India, and Pakistan has strongly responded to the Indian Foreign Minister’s “extremist rhetoric”.

The question now is what scenarios can be envisioned for the future of this conflict; the first scenario is Kashmir’s accession to India; the second is Kashmir’s accession to Pakistan; and the third scenario is the formation of a larger, independent Kashmir that includes both Pakistan-held and India-held Kashmir.

The third scenario includes a smaller independent Kashmir, so that the part held by India is ceded to the country and Pakistan-held Kashmir be annexed to Kashmir Valley. Then a smaller and independent Kashmir will be formed.

The fourth scenario is maintaining the status quo, i.e. accepting Kashmir as it was previously divided.

Finally, a no-solution scenario is that the critical situation of Muslims in Kashmir will continue without any solution until other alternatives are offered in the future.

Nevertheless, the ball is in the Pakistani court now, as India has taken steps to abolish Kashmir autonomy, and it is now the turn of the Islamabad government to respond, in a move, to India’s decision to abrogate Kashmir autonomy.

Of course, Pakistan seems to be in favor of settling the matter diplomatically, but India is unlikely to simply backtrack on what it has done. Because Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is a nationalist and those who voted for him in the parliamentary elections expected him to take the action on Kashmir. Modi in his election campaign slogans had promised voters to abrogate Kashmir autonomy. Anyways, today Kashmir can be the root of a new crisis and challenges in India-Pakistan relations.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading